How does 'formal' imperialism differ from 'informal' imperialism?

There is not one but several differences between formal and informal imperialism.

I will itemize what imperialism2.0 has and formal version (imperialism1.0) has not (the list is not in any kind of order):

  1. IMF (No, not the Imposible Mission Force I mean the real thing International Monetary Fund) IMF -- International Monetary Fund Home Page
  2. WB (World Bank) World Bank Group - International Development, Poverty, & Sustainability
  3. NATO (You do not need a link for this one, obsolete for years)
  4. Reserve Currencies Reserve currency - Wikipedia
  5. Credit Rating Agencies Credit rating agency - Wikipedia
  6. UN Security Council United Nations Security Council veto power
  7. NGOs which are funded mostly by government backed organizations or people. Imperialism1.0 had no NGOs.
  8. Terror groups are used to eliminate other terror groups created by imperslism2.0 in the beginning. Imperialism1.0 would just send an army to the country to be “protected”, imperalism2.0 arms and trains terrorist groups to fight each other to “destabilize” targeted country.
  9. On the issue of religious misinformation the best imperalism1.0 did was the charade Napoleon played in Egypt by pretending to be a Muslim savior. Imperialism2.0 creates new sects by degenerating religions Unification Church - Wikipedia Empire of Deceit: An Investigation of the Gülen School Network
  10. Trolls. The only trolls known to men at the time of formal imperialism was Grendel Grendel - Wikipedia and a few others. Now imperalism2.0 has millions all over the media.

Yorumlar

Bu blogdaki popüler yayınlar

İNSANLIĞIN YENİ SLOGANI CEHALET, BELAHET, HIYANET Mİ?

ARETE NEDİR VE NEDEN HEPİMİZİN ARETESİ OLMALIDIR?

Haftanın sekizinci günü: Gerçekertesi